The best books I read in 2023

It is such an odd experience to look back at books I read in the beginning of the year and think, That was this year?! Why does it feel so long ago? I thought this year went by quickly, but this sensation makes me think otherwise. So much happens in a year, I suppose. Looking at pictures of my nieces a year ago makes me wonder how they can grow and change so much in one year. Thinking back on where I was a year ago makes me feel like I’m in the weirdest version of Groundhog Day– the same, but oh so different. Time, man. It messes with you.

Anyway, as usual, I read some books this year, and here are my selections of the best of the bunch. Enjoy.

The Writing Life by Annie Dillard

This is a short book, but it’s one of my favorites of Dillard’s. Her energetic, impassioned writing is on display, and she is writing about something I have thought of and think of a lot: writing and making a life of writing. One of my favorite stories in the book is of a young student asking a professor if he thinks she could be a writer, to which he says, “That depends. Do you love sentences?” I’m not sure the student got it, but I do. To love sentences, words, punctuation, and grammar is not easy to explain– why are any of us drawn to the things we love?– but it’s real. This book is so good.

“One of the things I know about writing is this: spend it all, shoot it, play it, lose it, all, right away, every time. Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now. The impulse to save something good for a better place later is the signal to spend it now. Something more will arise for later, something better. These things fill from behind, from beneath, like well water. Similarly, the impulse to keep to yourself what you have learned is not only shameful, it is destructive. Anything you do not give freely and abundantly becomes lost to you. You open your safe and find ashes.”

– Annie Dillard, The Writing Life

“Write as if you were dying. At the same time, assume you write for an audience consisting solely of terminal patients. That is, after all, the case. What would you begin writing if you knew you would die soon? What could you say to a dying person that would not enrage by its triviality?”

– Annie Dillard, The Writing Life

Death in Yellowstone by Lee H. Whittlesey

This book describes the various deaths that have occurred in Yellowstone National Park, both by nature and by humans: hot springs, bears, drownings, falls, rocks, murders, suicides, plane crashes, etc. My list of things I never want to do got much longer after reading this book. It emphasized the importance of using one’s head, not acting like nature is tame, and being prepared in case things go south. The worst can happen so quickly.

“The worst possible situation is a person hiking alone who surprises a bear that is feeding (as on a carcass) and also has cubs. If this last situation happens to you, we will not expect to see you back at the trailhead.”

– Lee H. Whittlesey, Death in Yellowstone

The Collected Works of Billy the Kid by Michael Ondaatje

This was an interweaving of stories about Billy the Kid (William Bonney) and fictional thoughts of his. It was short, but it was interesting, the myth and legend of a killer from age 12 to 21. I love this sort of book and this time period for some reason, and, having just read James Joyce’s Ulysses, I was able to recognize Joyce’s influence on both the stream of consciousness and plays on language.

“These are the killed.

(By them) –
Charlie, Tom O’Folliard
Angela D’s split arm,

             and Pat Garrett

sliced off my head.
Blood a necklace on me all my life.”

– Michael Ondaatje, The Collected Works of Billy the Kid

A Sultry Month: Scenes of London Literary Life in 1846 by Alethea Hayter

This thoroughly-researched book covers the summer of 1846 in London, based on letters passed between the literary and art circles, including Benjamin Haydon (the painter who killed himself that summer), Elizabeth Barrett (right before she married Robert Browning), Browning, Charles Dickens, Thomas Carlyle, and others. I love learning about the lives of people, so I found this book fascinating (though I don’t expect others to to the same degree).

“Wordsworth never said more than he really felt, which disconcerted many of his contemporaries; ‘Wordsworth does more to unidealise himself than any man I know,’ said John Kenyon, sadly.”

– Alethea Hayter, A Sultry Month

Six Memos for the Next Millennium by Italo Calvino

These lectures were going to be given at Harvard and are organized by topic: lightness, quickness, exactitude, visibility, and multiplicity. However, only five were completed by the time of Calvino’s death. I love his wide knowledge and interest in myth, folklore, and literature, both modern and ancient, and his perspectives on the various topics he covers are unique and interesting. This only made me want to read more of his novels and short stories.

“I think that my first impulse arises from a hypersensitivity or allergy. It seems to me that language is always used in a random, approximate, careless manner, and this distresses me unbearably. Please don’t think that my reaction is the result of intolerance towards my neighbor: the worst discomfort of all comes from hearing myself speak. That’s why I try to talk as little as possible. If I prefer writing, it is because I can revise each sentence until I reach the point where – if not exactly satisfied with my words – I am able at least to eliminate those reasons for dissatisfaction that I can put a finger on. Literature – and I mean the literature that matches up to those requirements – is the promised land in which language becomes what it really ought to be.”

– Italo Calvino, Six Memos for the Next Millennium

“I know that every interpretation of a myth impoverishes and suffocates it; with myths, it’s better not to rush things, better to let them settle in memory, pausing to consider their details, to ponder them without moving beyond the language of their images. The lesson we can draw from a myth lies within the literality of its story, not in what we add to it from without.”

– Italo Calvino, Six Memos for the Next Millennium

Marriage Bureau by Mary Oliver and Mary Benedetta

I came across this book while searching for books by the poet Mary Oliver, and though this Mary Oliver is different, the book sounded intriguing. It is about the first dating/matchmaking service in London in the 1940s, and I loved hearing the stories of the type of people who sought a match, the types of things they wanted/liked/didn’t like in a partner, the successes, the oddballs, the challenges, the lessons, etc. This was so up my alley– studying people, trying to find what is best for them as individuals, even improving them when possible. I am happy I stumbled upon this book.

“Young men wander aimlessly through life, hoping that by some happy chance they’ll meet the girl of their dreams. Girls sit at home waiting for ‘Mr Right’, a nostalgic fantasy invented by their parents. There has to be a better way.”

– Mary Oliver and Mary Benedetta, Marriage Bureau

Mama’s Last Hug: Animal Emotions and What They Tell Us about Ourselves  by Frans de Waal

This book covers animal emotions from both research/scientific studies and anecdotes, as the author has studied animals for his entire career. It made so much more sense to me than the arguments I have heard in the past that humans are the only creatures with consciousness, emotion, impulse control, forward thinking, etc. As de Waal argues, animals have all of the above and are much more similar to us than we have granted in the past. I love it.

“Nevertheless, scholars keep obsessing about selfish motives, simply because both economics and behaviorism have indoctrinated them that incentives drive everything that animals or humans do. I don’t believe a word of it, though, and a recent ingenious experiment on children drives home why. The German psychologist Felix Warneken investigated how young chimpanzees and children assist human adults. The experimenter was using a tool but dropped it in midjob: would they pick it up? The experimenter’s hands were full: would they open a cupboard for him? Both species did so voluntarily and eagerly, showing that they understood the experimenter’s problem. Once Warneken started to reward the children for their assistance, however, they became less helpful. The rewards, it seems, distracted them from sympathizing with the clumsy experimenter. I am trying to figure how this would work in real life. Imagine that every time I offered a helping hand to a colleague or neighbor—keeping a door open or picking up their mail—they stuffed a few dollars in my shirt pocket. I’d be deeply offended, as if all I cared about was money! And it would surely not encourage me to do more for them. I might even start avoiding them as being too manipulative. It is curious to think that human behavior is entirely driven by tangible rewards, given that most of the time rewards are nowhere in sight. What are the rewards for someone who takes care of a spouse with Alzheimer’s? What payoffs does someone derive from sending money to a good cause? Internal rewards (feeling good) may very well come into play, but they work only via the amelioration of the other’s situation. They are nature’s way of making sure that we are other-oriented rather than self-oriented.”

– Frans de Waal, Mama’s Last Hug

In the Heart of the Sea by Nathaniel Philbrick

This book tells the true story of the whaleship Essex, the story that inspired Melville’s Moby-Dick. In 1819, the Essex set sail from Nantucket and ended up being rammed– intentionally– by an 80-ton bull sperm whale. The crew had to use three small whaling boats to try to find land, but, instead of heading to nearby islands for fear of cannibalism, they sailed for South America. Ninety days later, the few who had barely survived (resorting to, ironically, cannibalism) were saved. This was a harrowing, fascinating account that was not only well-written but also makes Moby-Dick come even more alive.

“Modern survival psychologists have determined that this ‘social’—as opposed to ‘authoritarian’—form of leadership is ill suited to the early stages of a disaster, when decisions must be made quickly and firmly. Only later, as the ordeal drags on and it is necessary to maintain morale, do social leadership skills become important.”

– Nathaniel Philbrick, In the Heart of the Sea

Life among the Savages by Shirley Jackson

This book about Jackson’s three children (four by the end) was so charming that I told my mom to read it. Jackson’s timing in her writing is so spot-on for perfect delivery of dry, subtle wit. The book was hilarious. Her son’s orneriness, her second daughter’s seven imaginary stepdaughters, her third daughter’s attempt to keep up, her husband’s resignation to the chaos– I love it all and now want to read her second book about her children.

“Our house is old, and noisy, and full. when we moved into it we had two children and about five thousand books; I expect that when we finally overflow and move out again we will have perhaps twenty children and easily half a million books; we also own assorted beds and tables and chairs and rocking horses and lamps and doll dresses and ship models and paint brushes and literally thousands of socks.”

– Shirley Jackson, Life among the Savages

The Overcoat and Other Russian Tales by Nikolai Gogol

This collection of Gogol’s stories was very funny– not in a laugh-out-loud way, but in a tickled sort of way. Misunderstandings abound; lessons are not learned. It was nice to read these after reading Nabokov’s Gogol, which gave me some context, background, and commentary.

“At the end of the table, the secretary was reading the decision in some case, but in such a mournful and monotonous voice, that the condemned man himself would have fallen asleep while listening to it. The judge, no doubt, would have been the first of all to do so, had he not entered into an engrossing conversation while it was going on.”

– Nikolai Gogol, The Overcoat and Other Russian Tales

On the Marble Cliffs by Ernst Jünger

This brief book is meditative yet devastating, portraying the destruction of a beautiful seaside town due to its own moral and traditional decay and the terror of the Head Forester, who uses the internal breakdown to his advantage. The brothers at the center of the narrative study flowers and plants in their retreat in the cliffs, but everything (their work, their friends, their home) goes up in flames at the end. They survive and make it across the water to safety and the welcome of another friend, but they lose and learn so much in the process. A beautiful book and allegory.

“We cannot count on seeing our work completed here below, and happy is the man whose will is not too painfully invested in his efforts. No house is built, no plan created, in which ruin is not the cornerstone, and what lives imperishably in us does not reside in our works.”

– Ernst Jünger, On the Marble Cliffs

The Violent Bear It Away by Flannery O’Connor

Per the summary in Hoopla (the app I use to listen to audiobooks), “the orphaned Francis Marion Tarwater and his cousin, Rayber, defy the prophecy of their dead uncle– that Tarwater will become a prophet and will baptize Rayber’s young son, Bishop.” Rayber wants to show Tarwater the more “reasonable” life outside of faith, and Tarwater struggles against himself. The innocent, mentally disabled Bishop is at the center. It is an engrossing, sad, thought-provoking book.

“Its face was like the face she had seen in some medieval paintings where the martyr’s limbs are being sawed off and his expression says he is being deprived of nothing essential.”

– Flannery O’Connor, The Violent Bear It Away

South of No North by Charles Bukowski

This collection of short stories was exactly what I would expect: dirty, reeking of booze, unhappy, irreverent, and oddly intelligent. Bukowski loves and hates women; he loves alcohol and knows it’s killing him; he hates work but occasionally does it anyway. One of the lines of a story sticks in my brain: the narrator suddenly gets famous for a minute, walks into a party in his favor, sees the women and “wants to rape all of them.” Instead, he gets drunk and wakes up alone hours later. That could sum up the gist of all these stories.

“Hospitals and jails and whores: these are the universities of life. I’ve got several degrees. Call me Mr.”

– Charles Bukowski, South of No North

Quietly Hostile by Samantha Irby

This is Irby’s fourth book, and I have read all of them. I was afraid of not liking this one– of it being too “woke” or boring because she’s told her best stories by now or something. But it actually felt like listening to a good friend tell me stories; I really enjoyed it. Irby is self-deprecating and funny, so even an essay that could have gotten political (about COVID) remained about her and her own idiosyncratic way of dealing with it. I’m happy I read this.

“I’m so embarrassed by everything all the time, humiliated even by the need to breathe air where other people can see me.”

– Samantha Irby, Quietly Hostile

“Diseased Brain is louder and meaner– and, if we’re being honest, funnier– than Regular Brain, and the only tool I have to shout it down is one I developed called ‘Wedding Guest,’ which mostly involves repeating ‘You are not the bride’ over and over to myself when I get overwhelmed about being seen by other human eyes and only have greasy sweatshirts at my disposal to present myself in.”

– Samantha Irby, Quietly Hostile

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by Anonymous

I love the movie The Green Knight and felt I should read the original poem. It differs from the movie in that its focus is on the tests of Gawain’s chastity while staying at the castle on his way to see the Green Knight. The lady of the house tempts him three days in a row, and on the third day she gives him a green sash to protect him. He does not tell the lord of the house about it, despite their agreement to share everything, and his failure comes to light when facing the Green Knight, who is actually the lord. Gawain must carry his cowardice home (he is not killed that day). It’s an interesting reversal of the movie version.

“Why should I not defy

Destinies strong and dear;

What can man do but try?”

– Sir Gawain and the Green Knight

The Curtain: An Essay in Seven Parts by Milan Kundera

This was such a good book about the art of the novel. Every section had insight on art, history, novelists, kitsch, life, etc. I would have been highlighting like mad if I hadn’t listened to the audiobook version. (The “curtain” is the readymade perception of the world that the novelist must rip to reveal what’s behind it.) I would highly recommend it.

“What does it mean to demonstrate in the streets, what is the significance of that collective activity so symptomatic of the twentieth century? In stupefaction Ulrich watches the demonstrators from the window; as they reach the foot of the palace, their faces turn up, turn furious, the men brandish their walking sticks, but ‘a few steps farther, at a bend where the demonstration seemed to scatter into the wings, most of them were already dropping their greasepaint: it would be absurd to keep up the menacing looks where there were no more spectators.’ In the light of that metaphor, the demonstrators are not men in a rage; they are actors performing rage! As soon as the performance is over they are quick to drop their greasepaint! Later, in the 1960s, philosophers would talk about the modern world in which everything had turned into spectacle: demonstrations, wars, and even love; through this ‘quick and sagacious penetration’ (Fielding), Musil had already long ago discerned the ‘society of spectacle.’”

– Milan Kundera, The Curtain

Internal Time: Chronotypes, Social Jet Lag, and Why You’re So Tired by Till Roenneberg

I saved this to my reading list years ago but just now got around to reading it. It was great– the author is a researcher of internal time, so he goes into so much research regarding the different chronotypes (early/late), the effects of the environment on our internal clocks, the consequences of living against our own internal clocks, and so much more. It helped me understand myself better and to understand my husband better, too (we have very different chronotypes, as many couples probably feel they do). This is a fascinating topic. I would highly recommend this book.

“Your internal time is produced by your own body clock. It varies from individual to individual just as body height, eye color, or personality varies, and it interacts with sun time and social time. In spite of internal time being probably the most important to our health and well-being–more important than sun time and certainly more important than social time–it has been thoroughly neglected.”

– Till Roenneberg, Internal Time

“Once enlightened, they started to understand themselves (and others) much better, began to appreciate their own individual time, and were suddenly relieved of the weight of prejudice ridiculing their temporal habits: for example, being called lazy if you don’t wake up fresh as a daisy by seven o’clock in the morning; or being called a boring person only because you don’t enjoy going out with friends after ten at night.”

– Till Roenneberg, Internal Time

Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl

I have been afraid to name this as one of the most impactful books of my life since I first read it in college because it feels like such a cliché: this book makes it on every “top books you should read in your lifetime” list. However, I had to read it this semester for a class, and visiting it again after 15 years revealed to me how much I had either internalized from the book or had learned for myself in that time because so much of what is in the book I have espoused to others (regarding suffering, meaning, the ridiculousness of “collective guilt,” paradoxical intention, etc.). I love Frankl and think that so many people would benefit from reading this book. This deserves its place on all the reading lists it’s on.

“Dostoevski said once, ‘There is only one thing that I dread: not to be worthy of my sufferings.’ These words frequently came to my mind after I became acquainted with those martyrs whose behavior in camp, whose suffering and death, bore witness to the fact that the last inner freedom cannot be lost. It can be said that they were worthy of their sufferings; the way they bore their suffering was a genuine inner achievement. It is this spiritual freedom —which cannot be taken away-that makes life meaningful and purposeful.”

– Viktor Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning

Black-out Poetry (Part 21)

When I make blackout poems, I usually try not to read the page I’m working from, at least not until I’m done making a poem, because I don’t want to be influenced by the actual meaning of the writing in making what I hope will be something new. That did not go so well with Seneca’s Dialogues and Essays— the writing was too compelling for me not to read each page I turned to, so I’m afraid that my poems below might just be summaries of what I read. Alas, I’m posting them here anyway…

On experiencing the fullness of existence

My husband and I and a friend of ours have been in conversation lately about life. We’ve discussed nihilism, faith, spiritual deserts, the importance of story, bearing a cross, and so much else. One question that came up this week was, how can we experience the fullness of existence? It was such a good question that I spent an entire day thinking about it and came up with the following response.

For one thing, I don’t think there’s any way for us to actually experience every aspect of existence fully— there’s just too much raw data; we need some sort of filter to make that data useful and relevant to us. I think our filter is our set of values: we must first know what we value, which we aren’t always as conscious of as we assume, and then we must make what we value a priority.

Our values will be probably found less by looking to or reading others and more by reflecting on and observing ourselves: what sorts of things did I gravitate towards as a child/young adult that made me fall into a flow state when engaged in them? In my best moments at any point in my life, what was I doing— was it the place that was important, the people I was with, the activity itself? What gets me excited? When I feel most alive, at peace, engaged, etc., what are the circumstances I’m in— am I with others or alone, am I actively doing something or not doing anything outward at all? What do I most long for? If everything in life were perfect, what would I be doing? I think our answers to those questions and questions like that should start bringing up some patterns, and the patterns should reveal what we value, both in the idealized version of our values and the ones we actually live out.

The prefatory question of “What are my values?” should be answered with the broader question of how to experience the fullness of existence in mind. Otherwise, the answers will be something like, “work, church, and family.” Everyone would say pretty much the same thing, and there’s no useful information in that. Without using the broader question as a lens through which to answer the values question, our answers would be too general, and they might even be ways of avoiding the broader question rather than engaging with it. So keeping that in mind, we can list out our values, ask ourselves why we value what we have on our list, and rearrange that list until it feels like the most accurate delineation of what we hold dear and what we aim for. That list of values (and even the order of priority of those values) are then the basis—the lens— of the steps we take in life to either move closer to experiencing the fullness of existence or moving away from it.

There are people who value sensory-based experience over anything else and will jump off cliffs or push themselves in intense and dangerous sports because that is where they feel they are extracting the fullness of life. On the other end of the spectrum, there are the ascetic types who believe the fullness of life can be reached by going further and further internally— they will become monks or nuns, live as quietly and inwardly as possible. Their lives externally look nothing like the first type of person I described, but both may feel they are getting at the core of existence. I think this leads me less to prescribing what exactly experiencing the fullness of existence is and more to asking a couple of questions that might help each person determine what it would look like for them in all their particularly to experience the fullness of existence. (I think it’s best not to have too long a list of criteria so that it can be more easily internalized and utilized in our everyday lives; hence, my list of questions is limited to two.)

The first important question we need to ask ourselves as we consider engaging in something: Does this align with the my purported values? It’s very odd when the answer to that is no. For example, my husband watches some guys stream sometimes, and one of them will occasionally rail against the harms of tap water or the contaminants in some supplements, but, all the while he’s talking, he’s vaping and drinking a beer. Presumably, he’s railing against those things because he values health, but the vaping and alcohol consumption would undermine that in a more obvious and immediate way than contaminated tap water or supplements. Either I’m confused by his message, or he’s confused about what he values.

The second important question to ask oneself, in my opinion, is, “Am I doing this thing— or not doing this thing— out of fear?” If the answer is “yes,” that’s a good indicator right there that we’re probably not experiencing the fullness of existence. Monks should not join monasteries because they fear lust; they should join them because they so value (so love) the pursuit of truth as they believe can best be found by joining the monastery. Sensory seekers should not jump off cliffs because they’re afraid of feeling anything less than a dopamine dump; they should do it because they believe that is the closest they can get to true, raw existence.

This second question can have some corollaries or iterations, if these alternatives are more pertinent to the situation: Am I doing this out of avoidance? Out of the desire for distraction? Because the better thing would just take too much work? Even the question of whether we’re doing/not doing something out of fear can be made more specific: Am I doing this out of the fear of missing out? Of being alone? Of feeling strong emotions? The list could go on.

So I think that, once we understand our values and understand what order our values are in for ourselves based on the question of experiencing the fullness of existence, the two most important questions to continually ask ourselves are:

– Does this align with my purported values?

and

– Am I doing this (or not doing it) out of fear?

There are variations of those questions, and they can be made as specific as you want. But if we can answer with a “yes” to the first and a “no” to the second, we probably won’t be far off the path on our journey.

On self-annihilation and redemption

Three years ago, I watched a movie called Another Earth that struck me deeper than any other movie has. I tried writing about it at the time, but I just couldn’t express how much it resonated. Then last week, my husband and I watched another movie called Oslo, August 31st. Set in Norway, based on the novel Will O’ the Wisp by Pierre Drieu La Rochelle, and with a male protagonist rather than a female one, it is not an obvious comparison to Another Earth. But it, too, struck me deeply, and I found myself thinking about the different ways to deal with the harm we cause others.

In Another Earth, Rhoda starts as a 17-year-old who goes out to celebrate her acceptance into MIT and then hits another car with her own, killing the pregnant mother and five-year-old son inside and leaving the husband in a coma. Four years later, she is released from prison. She lives with her parents and brother and works as janitor of a local high school, where she befriends another janitor, an older blind man named Purdeep. 

Rhoda learns where the man she hit with her car lives composing music, so she claims to be a house cleaner and offers to clean his house. They develop a relationship that, of course, ends heatedly when it’s revealed who she is. Nevertheless, she takes an opportunity to give him hope by relinquishing her own seat to him in a once-in-a-lifetime event, and this seems to release her to start living her life after that. She still works as a janitor, and she still lives with her parents. But she puts flowers on her nightstand, and she relishes the sun on her walk home from work. 

In Oslo, August 31st, Anders is in his last phase of a drug rehabilitation program. He is allowed out of the facility into the city to go to a job interview, and while in the city, he visits some of his friends and family. The spiritual void is apparent from the beginning of the movie: during a group therapy session, each patient who shares talks about how black their life is without drugs, how much better they felt about living when they at least had drugs to live for. Anders reveals the same when he visits his friend in Oslo: he’s 34 years old with no wife and no children, but he’s too intelligent to settle for the menial jobs and mediocre relationships that the other drug rehab patients will inevitably have. He warns his friend not to be surprised if he ends up overdosing.

The rest of the movie follows Anders over the remainder of that day. His interview ends poorly when the interviewer asks why there is a gap in his resume; his meeting with his sister doesn’t happen because she sends her wife in her stead. All of his old friends are living their own lives, but none of them seems content. They, too, have voids; they have no path to salvation to offer him. When he runs into one of his ex-girlfriend’s lovers at a bar and realizes just how poisonous he was to her (and, by extension, to so many others in his life), his decision is finalized. After dawn breaks, and he departs from the group he had been partying with, he walks to his parents’ empty house, plays a piece of classical music on their piano, and then kills himself in a bedroom with the entire stash of drugs he bought earlier in the night.

One of the most affecting things about Oslo, August 31st is the beginning: when he is talking with his friend or walking away from the failed interview, he is holding back tears, the kind of tears that are always right below the surface when you’re depressed, when you’re swimming in darkness and just know that that’s all there is, that there’s no way out. He doesn’t blame anyone–certainly not his parents or his ex-girlfriend or his friends. He knows his life is his responsibility and that his destruction of it is his own fault. But knowing it doesn’t make it any less sad. It makes sense why he does what he does– he even says to his friend that no one needs him, that it doesn’t matter if he stays or goes. 

The thing is, even if no one needs him, it does matter if he stays or goes. It matters so much, not that anyone tells him that. For one thing, we aren’t connected to each other simply out of need. To lose someone you love but don’t need– at least not in a utilitarian way– can still feel like having the skin on the entire front part of your body brutally ripped off and torn to shreds. You can feel exposed, bloody, incomplete. Something is missing. It hurts.

But also, and maybe more importantly, it doesn’t matter if anyone needs him. He’s been a drug addict for the past few years; his life has been experienced only as a taker. Suicide is a final, emphatic act of taking. A shift in perspective may be in order. He may find that, by no longer focusing on what he can get out of life but rather what he can give to it, he is no longer falling into an abyss. (And perhaps, by that point, someone will need him and want him to stick around.)

Yet the story has been written: we know that, to deal with his disappointed life– to deal with what he considers an existence that has only harmed others– he removes himself from the equation. He believes, understandably, that if he were no longer here, other people’s lives would be better. And maybe that’s true; I don’t know. But I doubt it. What he doesn’t see– what none of us can see– is how our lives change. I want him to read Saint Augustine’s Confessions, G. K. Chesterton, the writings of Paul; I want him to see that he’s not the first one in history to have done wrong and to learn from those who have sought Truth despite their flaws. I want him to use his formidable intelligence and abilities not just to change himself but to look beyond himself to better, higher things.

There is a character in Another Earth– Purdeep, the janitor Rhoda works with– who, rather than removing himself from the world to repent of his past sins, he punishes himself for them. One day, Rhoda comes in to work and sees a different coworker other than Purdeep. When she asks where Purdeep is, the new guy tells her he’s in the hospital because he poured bleach in his ears. “Why did he pour bleach in his ears?” she asks. “Why did he pour bleach in his eyes?” he responds. In his hospital room, she lightly touches his chest. “Rhoda,” he says sweetly. She sits down next to him and takes his hand before curling up next to him. “You are wondering why,” he says. “No… no… no… You know why.” In response, she opens his palm and writes FORGIVE on it with her finger. Tears just roll down his face.

This deep self-disgust should not be confused with self-pity. The hatred is turned inward, and the punishment is far worse than anyone else can do to the person. In fact, the punishment is in being the person; everything else is simply substantiation. Although both Anders and Purdeep take a centripetal perspective– one that turns inward– neither pities themselves nor looks to others to pity them. They know what they’ve done, and they take it on themselves to pass judgment. And oh, how damning that judgment is.

But we still have Rhoda, the main character of Another Earth. This girl has killed someone, spent time in prison, and is now in the humiliating position of cleaning up other people’s vomit, but she doesn’t kill herself nor perpetually punish herself. Hers is a more centrifugal perspective: she forgets about herself and looks outward. When she is offered the opportunity to leave her seemingly miserable life for another, potentially better one, she instead gives it up to the man she hurt and remains where she is. From there, she builds a life– a simple, humble life. There is no self-pity in her either, but neither is there self-judgment. The life of glory she once could have had is no longer an option; she accepts that. And who knows? Perhaps in this acceptance, this humble self-sacrifice, does she actually develop into the better version of herself, something she may not have become if she had stayed on her original path. We don’t know what the best version of ourselves looks like. The unfortunate thing is that so few of us allow ourselves to find out.

I wish I could tell Anders to hold out just a little longer to see with new eyes, to catch a glimpse of something that makes him put aside what he was doing and investigate what he glimpsed until he forgets what he was doing entirely and finds himself on a new, more hopeful path. And I wish I could open Purdeep’s hand and trace FORGIVE over and over in it. If only they, like Rhoda, could awaken from their depths of despair and disgust and experience the undeserving grace that comes out of abject humility, they may find that life is richer and more ineffable than they ever would have thought.

The solution of the problem of life is seen in the vanishing of the problem. (Is this not the reason why those who have found after a long period of doubt that the sense of life became clear to them have been unable to say what constituted that sense?)

There are, indeed, things that cannot be put into words. They make themselves manifest. They are what is mystical.

– Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractates Logico-Philosophicus

Black-out Poetry (Part 20)

How has been two and a half years since I last posted some blackout poetry?! Now that I’m back at the blogging game, I thought I would inaugurate it with some blackout poems, this batch coming from Carl Jung’s Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Because this was his autobiography, it is full of dreams and psychoanalysis (as the title suggests) as he plumbed the depths of his own subconscious self. These poems are probably a bit heavy as a result, but I have a feeling that a lot of my poems are heavy. So what’s new, really?

The best books I read in 2022

I’ve had to keep my head down and push forward this year, not coming up for air in any meaningful ways, yet despite this year being the most intense year of my adult life, professionally- and scholastically-speaking, I was still able to sustain my first and most abiding love of reading (even if I had to supplement it with more audiobooks and less handheld books than I prefer). I am just now coming out of the most stressful part of the year and am very hesitatingly yet gratefully starting to breathe a bit. In fact, the morning I started a draft of this post was my first morning in months where I read a book at my leisure during breakfast like I’ve done for years instead of reading an accounting article for school or a CPA exam prep book like I’ve been doing the past few months. It was beautiful.

Now that I have completed the courses for my degree, I am so looking forward to having time again to read for pleasure and contemplation. Maybe I will even revive this blog with my thoughts and musings. Until then, here is my annual list of the best books I read throughout the year, in no particular order (including a bonus at the end of the list).

The Hall of Uselessness by Simon Leys

Simon Leys was the pen name for Pierre Rychmans, a Belgian professor of Chinese Studies in Australia who wrote in both French and English. He was also deeply Christian (Catholic), which undoubtedly shaped his thinking and writing, both of which are clear-sighted, honest, and deeply insightful. He loved literature, so his writings on books and authors are personal, not detached or distanced. And though I don’t know or love China as much as he did, I learned a lot about it from this book. This collection was superb. I was sad when I finished it and was sad to learn that Leys died in 2014 and therefore isn’t writing more for me to read.

Chesterton put it well, in one of the introductions he wrote to Dickens’s novels: The function of criticism, if it has a legitimate function at all, can only be one function–that of dealing with the subconscious part of the author’s mind which only the critic can express, and not with the conscious part of the author’s mind, which the author himself can express. Either criticism is no good at all (a very defensible position) or else criticism means saying about an author the very things that would have made him jump out of his boots. The closer a book comes to being a genuine work of art, a true creation with a life of its own, the less likely it is that the author had full control over and a clear understanding of what he wrote. D. H. Lawrence, who was an exceptionally perceptive critic, summed this up in a statement I have already quoted many times but which one should never tire of invoking: “Never trust the artist. Trust the tale. The proper function of a critic is to save the tale from the artist who created it.”

– Simon Leys, The Hall of Uselessness

Saint Augustine— probably the very first modern psychologist— identified it 1,600 years ago:

People have such a love for truth that when they happen to love something else, they want it to be the truth; and because they do not wish to be proven wrong, they refuse to be shown their mistake. And so, they end up hating the truth for the sake of the object which they have come to love instead of the truth.

– Simon Leys, The Hall of Uselessness

String together all the pages that you have copied out over the course of your readings and, without there being a single line by you, the ensemble may turn out to be the most accurate portrait of your mind and your heart. Such mosaics of quotations resemble pictorial “collages”: all the elements are borrowed, but together they form original pictures.

– Simon Leys, The Hall of Uselessness

Life at the Bottom: The Worldview That Makes the Underclass by Theodore Dalrymple

Dr. Anthony Daniels (whose pen name is Theodore Dalrymple) is a psychiatrist who worked in prisons in England, and this book is a compilation of some of his thoughts and experiences from working with the underclass. He pulls no punches: abused women are co-authors of their misery, criminals should be held accountable, and the liberal elite are the worst of them all by originating and perpetuating theories of criminality/poverty that remove all responsibility/accountability from those doing the crimes. It’s also scary how the culture and habits of the lower class bleed upwards rather than vice versa. This is such a good book for those interested in looking at the world as it is.

Experience has taught me that it is wrong and cruel to suspend judgment, that nonjudgmentalism is at best indifference to the suffering of others, at worst a disguised form of sadism. How can one respect people as members of the human race unless one holds them to a standard of conduct and truthfulness? How can people learn from experience unless they are told that they can and should change? One doesn’t demand of laboratory mice that they do better: but man is not a mouse, and I can think of no more contemptuous way of treating people than to ascribe to them no more responsibility than such mice.

– Theodore Dalrymple, Life at the Bottom

And if I paint a picture of a way of life that is wholly without charm or merit, and describe many people who are deeply unattractive, it is important to remember that, if blame is to be apportioned, it is the intellectuals who deserve most of it. They should have known better but always preferred to avert their gaze. They considered the purity of their ideas to be more important than the actual consequences of their ideas. I know of no egotism more profound.

– Theodore Dalrymple, Life at the Bottom

Saint Francis of Assisi by G. K. Chesterton

Chesterton has been mentioned and quoted in several books I’ve read lately, so I’ve wanted to read him for a while. This is my first of his, and I listened to it one morning. It did such a good job of painting a portrait of St. Francis– his love of the world in very specific ways (each individual bird, tree, man, etc.), his quickness to act, his pursuit of all that we avoid (poverty, fasting, going without). This was so well-written.

But as St. Francis did not love humanity but men, so he did not love Christianity but Christ.

– G. K. Chesterton, St. Francis of Assisi

Now for St. Francis nothing was ever in the background. We might say that his mind had no background, except perhaps that divine darkness out of which the divine love had called up every colored creature one by one. He saw everything as dramatic, distinct from its setting, not all of a piece like a picture but in action like a play. A bird went by him like an arrow; something with a story and a purpose, though it was a purpose of life and not a purpose of death. A bush could stop him like a brigand; and indeed he was as ready to welcome the brigand as the bush.

– G. K. Chesterton, St. Francis of Assisi

In plain fact he was ready to live on refuse; and it was probably something much uglier as an experience than the refined simplicity which vegetarians and water drinkers would call the simple life.

– G. K. Chesterton, St. Francis of Assisi

Nathan Coulter by Wendell Berry

This is Wendell Berry’s first novel in his Port William series, and I thought I’d start here and work my way through his fiction. But I think I already read this one, or at least I read excerpts of it somewhere, because I knew some scenes and wasn’t surprised by what happened. It doesn’t matter, though– it was a well-written, good book that follows young Nathan in his adolescence from his mother’s death to his and his brother’s moving in with their grandparents to his apprenticeship under the wayward but worthy Uncle Burley to the fight between his father and his brother and ultimately to the death of his grandfather. It is a very sweet book.

Big Ellis giggled. “We heard you were dead, Burley.” “So did I,” Uncle Burley said. “But I knew it was a lie as soon as I heard it.”

– Wendell Berry, Nathan Coulter

These Precious Days by Ann Patchett

This collection of essays touches on topics of marriage, childlessness by choice, writing, fathers (the author had three in her life), divorce, friendship, cancer, nightstands, and more. It was much better than I expected– because I had seen it recommended so much in the previous year, I figured that it must be ideological in some way, but it was surprisingly not. The author openly admires John Updike, meets regularly with a Catholic nun, and runs a bookstore with no mention of being privileged or feminist or anything like that. Her friendship with Tom Hanks’s assistant Sooki was the most heartbreaking part of the book, but her experiences with her as Sooki went through cancer treatment while staying at the author’s house were touching. 

People want you to want what they want. If you want the same things they want, then their want is validated. If you don’t want the same things, your lack of wanting can, to certain people, come across as judgment.

– Ann Patchett, These Precious Days

I’d been afraid I’d somehow been given a life I hadn’t deserved, but that’s ridiculous. We don’t deserve anything – not the suffering and not the golden light. It just comes.

– Ann Patchett, These Precious Days

I would tell you we were idiots, but that’s only true in retrospect. In fact we were so exactly in the middle of history that we had no way to understand what we were seeing.

– Ann Patchett, These Precious Days

Simone Weil by Francine du Plessix Gray

This biography of Weil was my first in-depth look into Weil’s life and writings, though I’ve run into her through other people’s books and recommendations. She is very interesting: an anorexic, brilliant, anti-Semitic Jew who loved Christ and believed that other religions could access God equally. She fought for the poor, factory workers, and the dispossessed. She made enemies with her arguing and arrogance and yet had some very close friends and loved people as a whole. She was odd, and I’m sure I disagree with some of her ideas. But she intrigues me, and I want to read more.

But however much his convictions differed from hers, she exerted a powerful fascination on [Georges] Bataille, and they must have met occasionally, for he left the following portrait of her:

“Few human beings have interested me more deeply; her undeniable ugliness was repellent, but I personally felt that she also had a true beauty. she seduced by a very gentle, very simple authority; this was certainly an admirable being, asexual, with a sense of doom about her. Always black, black clothes, raven’s wing hair, pallid skin. She was surely very kind, and she was decidedly a Don Quixote who both pleased and terrified by her lucidity, her bold pessimism, and by an extreme courage that attracted her to the impossible.”

– Francine du Plessix Gray, Simone Weil

Right Ho, Jeeves by P. G. Wodehouse

When writers talk about authors they love, P. G. Wodehouse is often mentioned. I had never read any of his books until this one, but it made me feel like I have been missing out all these years. The dialogue was perfectly timed, entertaining, and so witty with all that was said (or not said), and though so much in the plot goes wrong, it never feels forced. The butler Jeeves is, of course, the genius everyone needs but who is not always looked to when he should be, while Bertie, Jeeves’s master, messes everything up (“Attila the Hun,” as his aunt calls him). This was such a fun read (and I would highly recommend listening to the version read by Simon Jones).

Beginning with a critique of my own limbs, which she said, justly enough, were nothing to write home about, this girl went on to dissect my manners, morals, intellect, general physique, and method of eating asparagus with such acerbity that by the time she had finished the best you could say of Bertram was that, so far as was known, he had never actually committed murder or set fire to an orphan asylum.

– P. G. Wodehouse, Right Ho, Jeeves

Nikolai Gogol by Vladimir Nabokov

I’m wary of calling this a biography, though its quirkiness fit its namesake and was as strange as Gogol was. Gogol sounds like a strange little man with strange obsessions and wanderings and strange people living in his imagination who can’t help but push their way into his stories. The book did not give a clear outline of Gogol’s life, nor did it provide the plot of any of the works of Gogol that it deconstructed. But (according to Nabokov), that is all much more in line with who Gogol was and the spirit of his works than a neat biography or anthology would be. I quite enjoyed this book.

We all know that trite trick, that coy spirit haunting first acts in Scribia as well as on Broadway. A famous playwright has said (probably in a testy reply to a bore wishing to know the secrets of the craft) that if in the first act a shot gun hangs on the wall, it must go off in the last act. But Gogol’s guns hang in midair and do not go off– in fact the charm of his allusions is exactly that nothing whatever comes of them.

– Vladimir Nabokov, Nikolai Gogol

He did something else, too. In fact he did the worst thing that a writer could do under the circumstances: he started explaining in print such points of his play as his critics had either missed or directed against him. Gogol, being Gogol and living in a looking-glass world, had a knack of thoroughly planning his works after he had written and published them.

– Vladimir Nabokov, Nikolai Gogol

Happy-Go-Lucky by David Sedaris

If David Sedaris writes a book, it’s almost a foregone conclusion that it will end up on my best-of list. This one is the most recent of Sedaris’s books of autobiographical essays, mostly covering his time in COVID and coming out of it: the shuttering of businesses; his staying in New York with his partner, Hugh; traveling to North Carolina to see his dad; his dad’s death; getting back on the road again once venues opened up; etc. It was fascinating to read about aspects of his dad that he waited to share until after his death– he was an odd man, his dad. And I was happy to read that Sedaris got his teeth fixed so that he is no longer ashamed of his smile. Reading his books is like catching up with a friend (albeit one who doesn’t know I exist). I can’t help but want to know about his life.

The terrible shame about the pandemic in the United States is that more than nine hundred thousand people have died to date, and I didn’t get to choose a one of them. How unfair that we lost Terrence McNally but not the guy on the electric scooter who almost hit me while he was going the wrong way on Seventh Avenue one sweltering afternoon in the summer of 2021. Just as I turned to curse him, he ran into a woman on a bicycle who had sped through a red light while looking down at her phone. Both of them tumbled onto the street, the sound of screeching brakes all around them, and I remembered, the way you might recall a joyful dream you’d once had, that things aren’t as bad as they sometimes seem, and life can actually be beautiful.

– David Sedaris, Happy-Go-Lucky

The Remarkable Ordinary: How to Stop, Look, and Listen to Life by Frederick Buechner

This short book is nevertheless rich with Buechner’s trademark kindness, honesty, and faith. He writes about his father who committed suicide, his daughter who was an alcoholic and anorexic, his mother who was embittered, his unlikely path to Christ and seminary, the joy of the small things in life and of Christ, and so much more. I listened to the audiobook version of it, but I would have been writing down excerpts if I had been reading the actual book. I love reading Buechner– he gives me hope. 

It seems to me almost before the Bible says anything else, it is saying that—how important it is to be alive and to pay attention to being alive, pay attention to each other, pay attention to God as he moves and as he speaks. Pay attention to where life or God has tried to take you.

– Frederick Buechner, The Remarkable Ordinary

We’ve all had saints in our lives, by which I mean not plaster saints, not moral exemplars, not people setting for us a kind of suffocating good example, but I mean saints in the sense of life givers. People through knowing whom we become more alive.

Frederick Buechner, The Remarkable Ordinary

An Apology for Idlers by Robert Louis Stevenson

I started reading this book before my semester started and was only able to return to it once my semester ended. It is a collection of essays on idleness, art, artist communities in France, forests, Monterey, love, youth vs. age, and enjoying unpleasant places. I enjoyed his perspective on all of these– I got the sense that he was both clear-sighted and joyful. I highlighted so many sections of this short book that my Kindle stopped saving them to the “My Clippings” file where highlights are saved on Kindle. It just says, “<You have reached the clipping limit for this item>,” that’s how much I liked it. Luckily, I can still see the highlighted sections in the actual book because I will want to go back and re-read them.

It is a sore thing to have laboured along and scaled the arduous hilltops, and when all is done, find humanity indifferent to your achievement. Hence physicists condemn the unphysical; financiers have only a superficial toleration for those who know little of stocks; literary persons despise the unlettered; and people of all pursuits combine to disparage those who have none.

– Robert Louis Stevenson, An Apology for Idlers

Perpetual devotion to what a man calls his business, is only to be sustained by perpetual neglect of many other things. And it is not by any means certain that a man’s business is the most important thing he has to do.

– Robert Louis Stevenson, An Apology for Idlers

There should be no honours for the artist; he has already, in the practice of his art, more than his share of the rewards of life; the honours are pre-empted for other trades, less agreeable and perhaps more useful.

– Robert Louis Stevenson, An Apology for Idlers

Special Addendum:

The Angel That Troubled the Waters by Thorton Wilder

This is not a book, so it isn’t technically one of the best books I read this year. But nothing I read this year affected me as much as this brief, three-page play. It takes so little time to read, but it resonates so deeply, so profoundly, that there is a hint of eternity in it. For me to describe it would take almost as much space as the play itself, so I would encourage everyone to read it for themselves. However, I will leave with this excerpt, which is perhaps the most affecting part of the entire thing (and is actually quite reminiscent of the ending of the Simone Weil biography):

THE ANGEL: (Without turning makes himself apparent to the NEWCOMER and addresses him.) Draw back, physician, this moment is not for you.

THE NEWCOMER: Angelic visitor, I pray thee, listen to my prayer.

THE ANGEL: Healing is not for you.

THE NEWCOMER: Surely, surely, the angels are wise. Surely, O, Prince, you are not deceived by my apparent wholeness. Your eyes can see the nets in which my wings are caught; the sin into which all my endeavors sink half-performed cannot be concealed from you.

THE ANGEL: I know.

THE NEWCOMER: It is no shame to boast to an Angel of what I might yet do in Love’s service were I but freed from this bondage.

THE MISTAKEN INVALID: Surely the water is stirring strangely to-day! Surely I shall be whole!

THE ANGEL: I must make haste. Already the sky is afire with the gathering host, for it is the hour of the new song among us. The earth itself feels the preparation in the skies and attempts its hymn. Children born in this hour spend all their lives in a sharper longing for the perfection that awaits them.

THE NEWCOMER: Oh, in such an hour was I born, and doubly fearful to me is the flaw in my heart. Must I drag my shame, Prince and singer, all my days more bowed than my neighbor?

THE ANGEL: (Stands a moment in silence.) Without your wound where would your power be? It is your very remorse that makes your low voice tremble into the hearts of men. The very angels themselves cannot persuade the wretched and blundering children on earth as can one human being broken on the wheels of living. In Love’s service only the wounded soldiers can serve. Draw back.

The best books I read in 2021

This has been quite a year. I started a graduate program, I got married, I moved, I started a new job, and I now live in the same town as my grandparents, parents, two sisters (and brother-in-law), and 2-year-old niece. I have had very little free time to do anything, but I have still managed to squeeze some books in (thanks in large part to audiobooks). Below are the ones I liked best, listed in the order I read them. There are some honorable mentions at the end, simply because I read so many books that are worth sharing that others might find interesting but that just didn’t make the cut for ‘the best’ (in my very biased opinion). So here they all are, for your reading enjoyment.

For the Time Being: A Christmas Oratorio by W. H. Auden

This is a long poem about the birth of Christ, told with many voices and perspectives. It is so profound and relevant to our age, challenging our mindset (materialism, science, distraction, etc.) and always bringing it back to what matters: Christ. I love poetry for what it can say without explaining or qualifying it, and this poem says so much. It has lines I could meditate on for days— I will need to re-read them to let them sink in. Beautiful.

“If we were never alone or always too busy,
Perhaps we might even believe what we know is not true:
But no one is taken in, at least not all of the time;
In our bath, or on the subway, or the middle of the night,
We know very well we are not unlucky but evil,
That the dream of a Perfect State or No State at all,
To which we fly for refuge, is a part of our punishment.
Let us therefore be contrite but without anxiety,
For Powers and Times are not gods but mortal gifts from God;
Let us acknowledge our defeats but without despair,
For all societies and epochs are transient details,
Transmitting an everlasting opportunity
That the Kingdom of Heaven may come, not in our present
And not in our future, but in the Fullness of Time.
Let us pray.”

My Thoughts Be Bloody: The Bitter Rivalry Between Edwin and John Wilkes Booth that Led to an American Tragedy by Nora Titone

This was a powerful, well-researched, well-written book on history, a genre I don’t typically gravitate towards. But the Booth family is fascinating—from the elder Junius Brutus, the brilliant polymathic actor who succumbed to debilitating alcoholism, to his ten illegitimate children of Mary Ann Holmes, the young flower-seller he took with him from England to America to escape the knowledge of his wife and child he left behind. Edwin, the only of Junius’s children who inherited his intelligence and unrivaled acting ability, grew the Booth name above the shame of its origins (and that of the acting vocation at the time) to meteoric wealth and fame while his brothers struggled to get by in acting, despite their lack of talent or ability. The resentment caused by the difference in personal life histories and subsequent incomes led to differing political stances and, eventually, the assassination of President Lincoln. I learned so much about the Civil War from this book and saw so many parallels to our own time– the extents to which people will go in the name of a ‘righteous’ ideology; the Draft Riots in New York City that became less about the draft and more about looting local businesses; the slant of journalism and the power of mob mentality– that it is shocking. This was an amazing book; I can’t believe I didn’t know so much of what was in it before now.

“The elder Booth had invested his villainous characters, one reviewer claimed, with appealing qualities like ‘heroic courage, sublime defiance and strong affection.’ It was the Booth genius to present Shakespeare’s evil protagonists as ‘fallen angels,’ men who were admirable and gifted in some ways, yet fatally misguided and flawed.”

“In his conclusion, John’s anger at the political situation seems to merge with his feelings of being disregarded by his family. The dishonorable conduct of Northern men, John cried, ‘makes me hate my brothers in the north. It severs all our bonds of friendship. It induces our brothers in the north to deny us our rights, to plunder us, to rob us! . . . It misrepresents me to the whole world.’”

“The truth, an anonymous reviewer explained in the Boston Daily Advertiser on May 19, 1862, was that John Wilkes Booth was no actor. Aside from good looks and an athletic ability, he had little to recommend him to audiences. It was evident this Booth had never been trained to breathe, to project his voice, or to speak in a way that conveyed emotion. Shakespeare was a foreign language to him.”

The Queen of Air and Darkness and The Ill-Made Knight by T. H. White

These two are the middle of the four books that comprise The Once and Future King, White’s chronicle of King Arthur and his knights. They are my favorite because they are the most psychological. The Queen of Air and Darkness introduces Queen Morgause– Arthur’s half-sister who is also half-witch– and her four boys, particularly their relationship to their narcissistic mother. They are so lost and so long for her love, and, as a result, they can be so cruel as an outlet for their confusion. In perhaps the most terrible and heartbreaking scene, the boys kill a unicorn to impress Morgause, but she does not notice when they try to show her and then has them whipped. 

The Ill-Made Knight follows Sir Lancelot and his adventures, sadnesses, love triangle with Guenever and Arthur, and final miracle. Lancelot, who is described as ugly, is so lovable and good, yet he believes himself to be so bad and carries so much shame. This book is also the story of the ups and downs of King Arthur’s Round Table of knights. It was well-written and emotionally complex. I was honestly surprised by how involved in this entire series of books I got.

“Indeed, they did love her. Perhaps we all give the best of our hearts uncritically—to those who hardly think about us in return.”

“In the secret parts of his peculiar brain, those unhappy and inextricable tangles which he felt at the roots, the boy was disabled by something which we cannot explain. He could not have explained either, and for us it is all too long ago. He loved Arthur and he loved Guenever and he hated himself. The best knight of the world: everybody envied the self-esteem which must surely be his. But Lancelot never believed he was good or nice. Under the grotesque, magnificent shell with a face like Quasimodo’s, there was shame and self-loathing which had been planted there when he was tiny, by something which it is now too late to trace. It is so fatally easy to make young children believe they are horrible.”

A Swim in the Pond in the Rain by George Saunders 

Bringing his graduate class to book form, Saunders goes through seven 19th-century Russian stories by Chekhov, Tolstoy, Turgenev, and Gogol to discuss the art of the short story: what it does, how to do it, variations of it, and the uniqueness/shortcomings of each of the writers (and how those only enhance their stories and their meanings). I loved that the stories were included in full so that I could read them all, and I loved Saunders’s openness and enthusiasm for writing, for fiction, for these stories in particular, and for short stories in general. This was such a fun book to read (even though I don’t aspire to write short stories!).

“To write a story that works, that moves the reader, is difficult, and most of us can’t do it. Even among those who have done it, it mostly can’t be done. And it can’t be done from a position of total control, of flawless mastery, of simply having an intention and then knowingly executing it. There’s intuition involved, and stretching—trying things that are at the limit of our abilities, that may cause mistakes. Like Yashka, the writer has to risk a cracking voice and surrender to his actual power, his doubts notwithstanding.

[…]

It’s hard to get any beauty at all into a story. If and when we do, it might not be the type of beauty we’ve always dreamed of making. But we have to take whatever beauty we can get, however we can get it.

I teach ‘The Singers’ to suggest to my students how little choice we have about what kind of writer we’ll turn out to be. . . . (‘The writer can choose what he writes about,’ said Flannery O’Connor, ‘but he cannot choose what he is able to make live.’)”

Dusk, Night, Dawn by Anne Lamott

What would a best-of list be without Anne Lamott? This is another of her books that touches on themes of grace, repentance, forgiveness, and faith (and, of course, love). It includes stories of her marriage (she got married in 2019 in her mid-60s), of her friends and Sunday school class (as usual), and of her parents. While she repeats lines and themes, and I feel like I know so much about her life, her books are always somehow refreshing, as if I didn’t know I could use a reminder to be less judgmental and more open. 

“What is nature sharing with us? If something is allowed to grow the way it was designed to, it works. When we try to get it to conform to the supposedly more efficient image we have of it, we get grotesqueries, imbalances. When we try to get difficulties to conform to our way of thinking, we often push them toward being fancier, and thus absurd. We strip away the grace of what is real, and true, and maybe even lovely.”

Between You and Me: Confessions of a Comma Queen by Mary Norris

Norris is a copyeditor at The New Yorker and wrote this book as part grammar manual/part memoir. I loved it. I am fascinated by both grammar/words and people’s personal stories, so this book was right up my alley. I loved learning more than I knew, re-learning what I already know, and getting different perspectives on things I think about (like the role of profanity in publications). I am glad I stumbled upon this one.

“But good writers have a reason for doing things the way they do them, and if you tinker with their work, taking it upon yourself to neutralize a slightly eccentric usage or zap a comma or sharpen the emphasis of something that the writer was deliberately keeping obscure, you are not helping. In my experience, the really great writers enjoy the editorial process. They weigh queries, and they accept or reject them for good reasons. They are not defensive. The whole point of having things read before publication is to test their effect on a general reader. You want to make sure when you go out there that the tag on the back of your collar isn’t poking up—unless, of course, you are deliberately wearing your clothes inside out.”

A Carnival of Snackery by David Sedaris

Ok, what would a best-of list be without David Sedaris? This is his collection of diary entries from 2002-2020, picking up where Theft by Finding left off, and it was so fun and easy to read. It made me wish I had kept a diary of bizarre things people say and do over the years because people are so weird. And Sedaris finds them. I also love how honest his thoughts are when people annoy or frustrate him– it makes me feel less bad for having those thoughts, too. I just want to read his books forever.

“After an hour at the leisure center, I went to the butcher shop and confused the guy behind the counter. ‘No one understands me when I talk,’ I said to Hugh when I returned home. ‘It’s really no different here than it was in France.’

‘That’s because you speak in non sequiturs,’ he said. And of course he’s right. Yesterday afternoon, when the butcher asked how my day had been so far, I held up my hands, which were scratched and bleeding from reaching into blackberry bushes for stray bits of trash, and said, ‘Don’t I look like I own a cheetah?’

I later said the same thing to my cashier at the grocery store but changed it to tiger. Not that it altered the reaction any. I just can’t for the life of me figure out what to say to people. I never have been able to, no matter what the language.”

The Benedict Option by Rod Dreher

I realize that not everyone will like or appreciate this book, but I found so much to think about and digest in this. I was really drawn to Dreher’s ideas about practicing asceticism, of reclaiming the Western civilization through literature and reading the early church fathers and great thinkers, of pulling our children out of public schools, of practicing liturgy and orthodoxy, of preparing for the downfall of the West and even of Christianity– I agreed with so much of it and was challenged by so much of it. It has me wondering (even more than I already do) about the best way to live, especially as a Christian in a world that is becoming increasingly hostile to true Christianity.

“In the Benedict Option, we are not trying to repeal seven hundred years of history, as if that were possible. Nor are we trying to save the West. We are only trying to build a Christian way of life that stands as an island of sanctity and stability amid the high tide of liquid modernity. We are not looking to create heaven on earth; we are simply looking for a way to be strong in faith through a time of great testing. The Rule, with its vision of an ordered life centered around Christ and the practices it prescribes to deepen our conversion, can help us achieve that goal.”

“In other words, ordering one’s actions is really about training one’s heart to love and to desire the right things, the things that are real, without having to think about it. It is acquiring virtue as a habit.”

“Rather, they must keep their balance and stay focused on, in Havel’s words, ‘the everyday, thankless, and never-ending struggle of human beings to live more freely, truthfully, and in quiet dignity.’”

Honorable Mentions:

The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame

Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life by Dr. Jordan B. Peterson

Human Diversity by Charles Murray

The Philosophy of Andy Warhol: From A to B and Back Again by Andy Warhol by Andy Warhol

Seeking in the desert (a poem)

You will never fully

get the sand out of your hair

when you live in the desert.

You will never have enough water.

You will smell, because

you will be dirty.

But you won’t leave.

You are looking for something;

you are waiting.


This is all you get;

this is your inheritance:

dust and illusions.

You came for something more?

Ah, but that is not 

for you to find.

Not unless you let go

of any you that wants,

of the you you are.


You, with the sunburnt face

and empty hands,

what are you seeking?

When will you give up?

You will never find it

with the eyes you’re looking through.

You will not be able 

to explain it when you do.


See, the desert is not 

where the lost are found 

but where the lost lose 

everything they have


and are transformed. 

The best books I read in 2020

It’s that time of year again where I compile a list of all the best books I’ve read since January and share them for anyone in need of a recommendation. I list them in the order I read them, so they aren’t ranked from best to worst or listed alphabetically or even by publication date. They are just here. Why I chose to read these books over others this year, I can’t say. My method of choosing what to read next is done more by feel than by logic: maybe I’m more in the mood for a good plot right now, so I read fiction; maybe I put a book on hold at the library several weeks ago that has just become available, so I read that one; maybe a book just came out that I think I have to read immediately; maybe a book was written centuries ago, and I think I should finally get around to reading it. There’s no rhyme or reason to it. So, by happenstance or by fate, here are the best books I read in 2020.

Consider This: Moments in My Writing Life after Which Everything Was Different by Chuck Palahniuk

This is Palahniuk’s book of writing advice for fiction writers. I do not aspire to be a fiction writer, but I found his advice to be solid and thought-provoking, worth trying out in my own writing. His anecdotes and stories were just as engaging as you’d expect (if you have any experience with his fiction), and I found myself not wanting this book to end. I want to read every story and book he recommended (and he recommended a lot). I also (briefly) wanted to try writing something. This was so good.

“Whatever the case, we recognize the truth when we read it. The best writers seem to read our minds, and they nail exactly what we’ve never been able to put into words.”

Biloxi by Mary Miller

This novel, set in Mississippi, follows the narrator, Louis, as his life changes, all because he was given a dog named Layla. He is retired, fat, and drinks too much, and he leads a rather anti-social life, sitting in his chair in his living room. The dog causes all sorts of events to unfold– often messy encounters with other people– but it also sparks a change in Louis, an evolution which is never obvious or sentimental. It made for a funny and surprisingly fun book to read.

“Life was a mystery. It was a goddamned mystery and I didn’t like it one bit. It was also the only thing worth living for.”

Same Old Story by Dawn Potter

This book of poems touches on themes of fairy tales, mythology, and the mundane, and I really enjoyed it. The poems are often story-like and not abstract, so they were more in line with what I enjoy and understand in poetry. I want to read more by her now.

“Though now we share this morning’s dose of loneliness.

God forbid

that we should mention such a thing.”

Emma by Jane Austen

Having only seen the movie and TV series, I felt the need to read the book to truly know the story and all the finer details that compression leaves out. It did not disappoint. Though it was long, it went into such detail of human gesture and interaction as to take me there and make me relate to the characters, their actions, motives, etc. Jane Austen is remembered and still read for good reason, in my opinion.

“Emma was sorry;– to have to pay civilities to a person she did not like through three long months!– to be always doing more than she wished, and less than she ought!”

Telling the Truth: The Gospel as Tragedy, Comedy, and Fairy Tale by Frederick Buechner

Wonderful. This was such an eloquent, poetic, and literary book, all the while showing just how the Gospel is truth as silence, as tragedy, as comedy, and as fairy tale. I love Buechner’s writing, and I love how it makes me think. I just want to write and talk with others about what he writes. I loved this. [Also recommended: Reading Buechner by Jeffrey Munroe, where I first read about Telling the Truth. Reading Buechner covers what the author believes to be the ‘essential’ books of Buechner’s to read, ranging from his novels to his memoirs and sermons, and it made me want to read all of his books immediately.]

“When they brought Jesus to the place where his dead friend lay, Jesus wept. It is very easy to sentimentalize the scene and very tempting because to sentimentalize something is to look only at the emotion in it and t the emotion it stirs in us rather than at the reality of it, which we are always tempted not to look at because reality, truth, silence are all what we are not much good at and avoid when we can. To sentimentalize something is to savor rather than to suffer the sadness of it, is to sigh over the prettiness of it rather than to tremble at the beauty of it, which may make fearsome demands of us or pose fearsome threats.

[..]

But here standing beside the dead body of his dead friend he is not Gregory Peck. He has no form or comeliness about him that we should desire him, and as one from whom men hide their faces we turn from him. To see a man weep is not a comely sight, especially this man whom we want to be stronger and braver than a man, and the impulse is to turn from him as we turn from anybody who weeps because the sight of real tears, painful and disfiguring, forces us to look to their source where we do not choose to look because where his tears come from, our tears also come from.”

The Total Money Makeover by Dave Ramsey

I would be remiss if I didn’t include this book in the best books I read this year– I really believe it is life-changing. I felt completely ignorant of money prior to reading this, except that I knew I don’t ever want to be in debt. Thankfully, I got that part right according to Ramsey, and he writes about where exactly to go from there and how. I feel so much more confident in the future now; this book and its principles have given so many people hope. 

“Money is good for FUN. Money is good to INVEST. And money is good to GIVE. Most anything else you find to do with it doesn’t represent good mental and spiritual health on your part.”

Naive Super by Erlend Loe

I forget now how I first heard of this book, but I am happy I did. It is written in such simple language about a twenty-something having an existential crisis and finding his way out of it through realizing that there is meaning in life as well as love. There is no preachiness about it; no philosophies or ideologies are pushed. It was just a guy having a hard time until he’s not. I would easily read it again.

“My grandfather is a really good guy. I wonder whether I am a really good guy. I wonder whether there are any really good guys at all in my generation.”

Breaking Bread with the Dead by Alan Jacobs

The third of Jacobs’s books encouraging people to read and think better (after The Pleasures of Reading in an Age of Distraction and How to Think), this one focuses on the importance of engaging with past figures by reading what they wrote and enjoying and being challenged by them. I loved his concepts of temporal bandwidth and personal density and have already brought them up in so many conversations because of their relevance to our era. 

“Fortunately, you don’t have to read the novel [Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow] to grasp the essential point that one of its characters makes. That character is a German engineer named Kurt Mondaugen, and his profession perhaps explains the curiously technical language he uses to express his core insight. Here is the passage in which we learn about ‘Mondaugen’s law’:

‘Personal density,’ Kurt Mondaugen in his Peenemunde office not too many steps away from here, enunciating the Law which will one day bear his name, ‘is directly proportional to temporal bandwidth.’

‘Temporal bandwidth’ is the width of your present, your now. . . . The more you dwell in the past and in the future, the thicker your bandwidth, the more solid your persona. But the narrower your sense of Now, the more tenuous you are. It may get to where you’re having trouble remembering what you were doing five minutes ago.'”

What I Didn’t See and Other Stories by Karen Joy Fowler

A collection of short stories, these range in topic from John Wilkes Booth and his brother Edwin to fairy tale retellings and gorilla hunting (and so much more). Even thinking about some stories in particular (such as “King Rat”) make my heart hurt; they are that impactful. I just love how Fowler writes. (I first encountered Fowler by reading her novel We Are All Completely beside Ourselves, another well-written and surprisingly relatable story that I would highly recommend.)

“Have I been clear? I didn’t like Daisy and she didn’t like me and this was because neither one of us was likable.”

The Best of Me by David Sedaris

What is a best of list without mentioning Sedaris? Though his newest collection of stories– both fiction and non– doesn’t have any previously unpublished work and is sort of a ‘greatest hits’ (chosen by Sedaris himself), I still enjoyed reading it as I always enjoy reading anything by him. I hadn’t remembered reading some of the stories, even though I think I’ve read everything by him, so some felt new to me. And re-reading was nice, like I was checking in on a familiar friend. (I would also recommend his Kindle short, Themes and Variations, which is an essay on the themes that run through his book tours.)

“I didn’t have the analogy of the stovetop back then, but what I’d done was turn off the burner marked ‘family.’ Then I’d locked my door and sat there simmering, knowing even then that without them, I was nothing. Not a son or a brother but just a boy– and how could that ever be enough? As a full-grown man it seems no different. Cut off your family, and how would you know who you are? Cut them off in order to gain success, and how could that success be measured? What would it possibly mean?”

The Narnian: The Life and Imagination of C. S. Lewis by Alan Jacobs

Jacobs does a wonderful job of not only writing about Lewis’s life and writings but also shedding light and offering insight on the interplay between the two. Jacobs is such a gifted writer, and he makes Lewis seem like a complicated but deeply kind, intelligent, and passionate man who, once he came to Christianity at thirty, defended and embodied it for the rest of his life.

“Perhaps this is why Saint Francis, so the story goes, instructed his followers to ‘preach the Gospel always, using words if necessary.’ . . . After all, an apologist for Christianity, to some degree at least, commits himself or herself to answering questions that Jesus himself consistently refused to answer. [. . .]

But strange to say, there is a kind of language that, if it does not avoid such superficiality, nevertheless shows an awareness of that danger and in a sense can point beyond itself. I refer to the language of stories– perhaps especially the language of fantasy and fairy tale. Sometimes fairy stories may say best what’s to be said.”

The timeliness of Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Harvard speech

For months, I have inwardly debated writing something about the times we are living in and have— until now— come out on the side of keeping my thoughts to myself. But I just read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s commencement address to Harvard in 1978, and the prescience and relevance to our own era are too uncanny not to comment on. He could give the same speech today, and we would have no idea it was written over thirty years ago.

Solzhenitsyn wrote The Gulag Archipelago from his experience in the prison camps under Communist Russia. It is a scathing critique of Communism, and Solzhenitsyn pulls no punches. Even in his speech at Harvard, he states unequivocally, 

“I hope that no one present will suspect me of expressing my partial criticism of the Western system in order to suggest socialism as an alternative. No; with the experience of a country where socialism has been realized, I shall not speak for such an alternative. The mathematician Igor Shafarevich, a member of the Soviet Academy of Science, has written a brilliantly argued book entitled Socialism; this is a penetrating historical analysis demonstrating that socialism of any type and shade leads to a total destruction of the human spirit and to a leveling of mankind into death.” [emphasis mine]

However, this Harvard speech is targeted at the West rather than the East (his book does plenty of the latter). He is disgusted by the West’s materialism and reliance on freedom without any sense of responsibility or accountability. His main argument is that, by embracing the humanism put forth during the Renaissance and Age of Enlightenment (“…the pro-claimed and practiced autonomy of man from any higher force above him. It could also be called anthropocentricity, with man seen as the center of all.”), the West has neglected the spiritual self for the purely physical, and this has had dire consequences for us. 

“Everything beyond physical well-being and the accumulation of material goods, all other human requirements and characteristics of a subtle and higher nature, were left outside the area of attention of state and social systems, as if human life did not have any higher meaning. Thus gaps were left open for evil, and its drafts blow freely today. Mere freedom per se does not in the least solve all the problems of human life and even adds a number of new ones.”

Because we have emphasized freedom, we have become confused about what that word means. It is not uncommon to hear demands for free things– like education and healthcare– out of the same mouths that are demanding lesser or no penalties for crimes. Freedom does not guarantee that we will be given anything; we are responsible for acting morally when given freedom. But that concept has been bulldozed for one demanding more more more while demanding that even less be asked of us.

“And yet in early democracies, as in American democracy at the time of its birth, all individual human rights were granted on the ground that man is God’s creature. That is, freedom was given to the individual conditionally, in the assumption of his constant religious responsibility. Such was the heritage of the preceding one thousand years. Two hundred or even fifty years ago, it would have seemed quite impossible, in America, that an individual be granted boundless freedom with no purpose, simply for the satisfaction of his whims.

[. . .]

It is time, in the West, to defend not so much human rights as human obligations.

On the other hand, destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society has turned out to have scarce defense against the abyss of human decadence, for example against the misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, such as motion pictures full of pornography, crime, and horror. This is all considered to be part of freedom and to be counterbalanced, in theory, by the young people’s right not to look and not to accept. Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.”

Evil has been given free rein for the very reason we have refused to acknowledge it. If we were to bring it up in everyday conversation, it would be dismissed as superstitious residue from an obsolete religion, one with no relevance to our modern-day lives. The truth is much more serious, and we ignore our spiritual selves at our peril: “But the fight for our planet, physical and spiritual, a fight of cosmic proportions, is not a vague matter of the future; it has already started. The forces of Evil have begun their decisive offensive. You can feel their pressure, yet your screens and publications are full of prescribed smiles and raised glasses. What is the joy about?”

It is easy to avoid the spiritual side of existence. We have plenty of distractions, plenty of other people’s lives to obsess over. But though we may feel entitled to these distractions and even to the details of other people’s lives, Solzhenitsyn believes that we would do far better to exercise our self-restraint and our right not to look, “not to have their divine souls stuffed with gossip, nonsense, vain talk. A person who works and leads a meaningful life has no need for this excessive and burdening flow of information.”

The sad thing is, I can think of very few who have no need for the “excessive and burdening flow of information.” It is incessant, and it is very often wrong. Yet this is what we base our opinions and sensibilities on– this misleading, unreliable, factually-confused barrage of information that we have insufficient filters for and an inability to entirely contain. Then policies are made in alignment with these unverified ideas, and the domino effect has begun.

“Without any censorship in the West, fashionable trends of thought and ideas are fastidiously separated from those that are not fashionable, and the latter, without ever being forbidden have little chance of finding their way into periodicals or books or being heard in colleges. Your scholars are free in the legal sense, but they are hemmed in by the idols of the prevailing fad. There is no open violence, as in the East; however, a selection dictated by fashion and the need to accommodate mass standards frequently prevents the most independent-minded persons from contributing to public life and gives rise to dangerous herd instincts that block dangerous herd development.”

We cling even tighter to these ideas because we believe they are legitimized by society’s acting on them. But we are just part of the herd, being pushed along with no idea of where we are going. We believe there is safety in numbers, and we don’t want to know what it’s like to be alone by ourselves.

Therein lies the danger. We need to stop eating the lies we are fed; we need to start fighting for something deeper than material happiness and more eternal than this finite life. There is a lot wrong with the world right now, but it is not what we are being told is wrong. Solzhenitsyn saw clearly what our weaknesses are. If we haven’t gotten better in the thirty years since he showed them to us, what will it take for us to finally understand?